Structural Sacred Cows 1
Local attorney Gregg J. Cavanagh had his guest commentary published recently in the Minneapolis Star Tribune: How to make state budget easy to balance. In it, Cavanagh claims that "balancing the state budget would be easy — if our leaders were willing to kill a few sacred cows." He lists nine of them, and it's a great list, worthy of several posts, to wit:
- Cut the size of the Legislature.
"Minnesota has far more legislators per capita than even a geographically and economically complex state like California. Maintaining this large a Legislature is expensive. Even more expensive is the unnecessary legislation the senators and representatives must generate to demonstrate they are 'doing something.' The Legislature should be reduced in size, and legislators' compensation and per diem should be reduced to a level appropriate for a part-time Legislature."
- Eliminate the education monopoly.
- Turn off the welfare magnet.
- Place a moratorium on light-rail projects.
- Reduce or eliminate the corporate income tax.
- Outsource whenever possible.
- Repeal the prevailing wage law.
- Ban project labor agreements.
- Stop trying to run everything.
I'm afraid that the position of Legislator will never be considered part time again. They might get shamed into shaving their excessive per diems a little, but they're not going to cut their own pay or benefits. And you're certainly not going to get them to reduce their numbers for fear they're one of the "reducees." Not unless...
Many disagree with me, but I'd like to see a unicameral Legislature. The two house concept was a grand political compromise needed to adopt the U.S. Constitution, not any model of good government; quite the opposite. There's no accountability if you can blame the other chamber or the conference committee conveniently stacked by the leadership. A lot of busy work is created in coordinating the operation of those two chambers. And if two are better than one, why aren't three better than two?
What's the right number? If the Senate can claim to do full justice to all the legislation it handles, clearly 67 is adequate, especially if the above coordination and busy work is eliminated. So close the House, use the existing district boundaries, just shift the terms to elect half the body every two years.
Who survives among the three current office holders in each district? I'd say whoever has been there the longest. Senator wins the ties with the House, otherwise that district is in the first group of elections.
What's the right pay? This is the key. As part of the Constitutional Amendment that would obviously be required, set it high enough to get that Amendment through the current bodies. Include money for lavish expansion and remodel of their offices. Install a Zagat-rated cafeteria and Olympic-class workout facilities, including a pool. Provide Superintendent-level retirement and severance packages.
In other words, spend whatever it takes. Buy those votes! It will still be chump change as part of our $25+ billion annual state spending. If it makes it impossible for the remaining Legislators to generate all the extra nonsense they pass each year, it's almost certain to be a net plus.
The Referendum has passed. The right-sizing has been made. The resulting program restorations have been adopted. The Legislature has yet to weigh in, but the 2009-2010 Budget can and will now take shape. And, I can resume my T.E.R.M. paper to see if I can make District 281's finances more understandable.