Speed Gibson

It's July: no politics until August.
Roll out those lazy, hazy, crazy days of summer!

The Empire Strikes Back

I saw this is Saturday's paper, and am a little surprised that it didn't draw much comment. Anti-Strib and Bogus Gold did.

The tobacco companies are suing the state, arguing that the "health impact fee" violates the 1998 Tobacco Settlement, where the "state agreed not to seek more money for health care costs". As the Taxpayers League has pointed out, smokers are already funding 100% of their supposedly added medical costs. Even if they lose on technicalities, it would appear they have a moral case here. I'm a little surprised that no one seems to have noticed this until now, be they politicians, bloggers or the MSM.

Our Governor seems unwilling to be bound by existing treaties (Racino threat to tribes) and settlements like this. I fear our existing state law requiring a referendum for the Twins stadium proposal will also soon be trampled.
Bob from the Lung Association of Minnesota (mail) (www):
I think the story in page one of Sunday's Star Tribune explains why Big Tobacco is stepping out of the shadows and fighting in the open. There is no "moral case" here, only free market forces at work. The combination of local ordinances, the "fee" and high-profile cases like the Peter Jennings death is sharply reducing the number of current (and would-be) smokers in Minnesota. Big Tobacco knows (as we do) that the number of smokers will likely drop significanly in the next statewide survey -- they are just trying to hang on to their tobacco addicts at all costs.
8.29.2005 9:50am
Tracy (mail) (www):
I did mention it this weekend and I followed up last night. Note that Darth Bob is very concerned about this case. It could topple the house of cards that supports the tobacco payments.

I'd say it all depends on which judge gets the case and how the tobacco fee law was written.
8.29.2005 1:24pm
R-Five (Speed Gibson) (www):
The moral case is that the State promised not to seek any more revenue in the name of health care, not whether smoking itself is good or evil.
8.29.2005 8:59pm