Stasiu's Bar
[T]hat’s your problem, Bob. You cannot articulate a set of neutral criteria independent of secondhand smoke that necessitates government intervention, yet you demand that government intervene. You [refuse] to acknowledge that the policy you support does cause harm[. Y]our argument, [that] if the greater good is served then there is no harm[, is similar to the argument for sterilization of the retarded. And you can’t articulate the scientific evidence for the dangers of secondhand smoke -- you can only spit back estimates with no statistical support.
Your cause is just, Bob. Your methods are despicable.
These methods are why I will be slashing my annual United Way donation in half this year, until they publicly refuse to help charities like Bob's that engage in such blatant, destructive political activity.
However, when he challenges the medical and scientific evidence that shows the health risks of primary smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke, uses veterans and pulltab charities as pawns in his argument, and tries to makes a martyr out of pro-smoke activists like Sue Jeffers, he shows his true colors.
PS: Like the smoking ordinances, I'm still still standing.
Why don't we ban alcohol and save even more lives?
Let's set the speed limit on all roads to 5 mph and there will never be another road fatality again - 50K lives saved!!!
You're a pathetic socialist goon.