Hutchinson stock plummets
In Tuesday's Minneapolis Star Tribune, Peter Hutchinson was
Reading it as a liberal, I saw nothing I didn't like. There was no talk of sacrifice or either-or. All programs will continue and many will significantly increase. Consider just these two points:
- Doubling the odds that our ninth-graders will become college grads -- that, more than anything else, will fire up our economic engine.
- World-class health at the lowest cost in the nation; better health, better care for every Minnesotan -- that will get this job-killer off our backs.
- Don't raise the 5 G's: guns, gays (marriage), God, gambling and gynecology. You would raise these things only if this were a political campaign speech and you wanted to get your "base" riled up.
Other bloggers have already written off Hutchinson as just another lefty. I did my best to keep an open mind, hoping for a real leader with real management skills and the sense to use them properly. But the bloggers were correct. Hutchinson is just another lefty, whose first act of real honesty should be to get in the DFL race with the others of his kind.
So as of now, I am left with Sue Jeffers. There must be a better way to say that, like, I would be supporting her now if she were in the GOP race, if there were one.
But Peter Hutchinson, you're fired!
Her campaign seems to have things in order and her platform fits Minnesota pretty well: fiscally conservative and socially moderate. Pawlenty failed Minnesota. Hatch just likes the spotlight. Doran has money, but that's about it. And the rest of the DFL candidates don't have a chance. Hutchinson is not a bad guy, but there's a difference between people in a career field with expertise and then the person in charge of running a state of several MILLION people.
Maybe Hutchinson should pull out now and hop on the Jeffers bandwagon...he balances her ticket pretty well, and then that way, the third party vote doesn't have to be split... Thoughts?
Not a lot of difference when your candidate has no chance whatsoever of winning, so the running of government isn't a great concern.
Seriously, whether or not I personally agree, I understand a protest vote for a candidate like Jeffords. I just don't understand those who can't accept the notion that this IS a protest vote, and that Jeffords can't possibly win.
This year, Jeffers looks like our best bet. I'm voting for her, not as a protest, but a true vote of support for the right person for the job.