Speed Gibson

It's July: no politics until August.
Roll out those lazy, hazy, crazy days of summer!

My Slate

A number of bloggers are publishing summaries of their preferences. Here are mine, several of which I have detailed in earlier posts.

  • Mark Kennedy (R) for U. S. Senate. Much more experienced, sees the world as it is, unlike his opponent.

  • Jim Ramstad (R) for U. S. Representative, District 3. Running unopposed in any real sense.

  • Peter Hutchinson (I) for Governor. If we must elect a liberal, I prefer civility and clarity.

  • Steve Arakawa (R) for Minnesota Senate 46. The incumbent is just collecting a check, shown some poor judgement. It's time for a change.

  • Debra Hillstrom (D) for Minnesota House 46B. Understands her district, merits at least one more term.

  • Mary Kiffmeyer (R) for Secretary of State, probably the best in my lifetime.

  • Patricia Anderson (R) for State Auditor, again probably the best in my lifetime.

  • Jeff Johnson (R) for Attorney General. He will refocus the office on its primary duty, which is not consumer protection.

  • NO on the "Transportation" Constitutional Amendment. It's bad law, bad policy, unnecessary, and ultimately a tax increase.

  • None of the Above for Hennepin County Commissioner, District 1. The incumbent thinks he's much smarter than the people he represents. His opponent is an anarchist.

  • Rich Stanek for Hennepin County Sheriff, the right man for the times, despite the Strib endorsement.

  • Mike Freeman (D) for Hennepin County Attorney. He knows the job and the turf. It's the wrong year to gamble on a visionary.

  • No idea on Soil and Water District Supervisors. And who are all these people filing for these jobs?

  • Tim Willson (D) for Mayor of Brooklyn Center, the one best qualified to "refocus" the City Council on what's important.

  • Mark Yelich, Dan Ryan for Brooklyn Center City Council, qualified, needed fresh blood to replace an incumbent that just doesn't understand city government.

  • Incumbents rule on the back page, the judicial candidates.

eric (mail):
Peter Hutchinson is by far teh most liberal candidate in the race and has yet to find a new tax that he won't raise in the name of better government. He has gotten a free ride in this race. My biggest problem with him is that he keeps saying that he is going to "save" $1-2 billion out of the health care system. This wouldn't be so disturbing from someone who doesn't know anything about how we finance state government, but this guy was the former Finance Commissioner. First, most of what Hutchinson proposes will take additional investment to get us to the electronic medical record system he invisions. He says he will just mandate the entire medical community invest tens of billions into more efficient systems. Then he incorrectly says the state will capture the savings from that investment. Even if the medical community universally invested as Hutchinson says he would, the Finance Department would not "score" this savings on any fiscal note that the state could use for budget purposes. He is guilty of the phony budgeting he says he opposes. I would highly recommend you change your vote to Pawlenty, or get stuck with Hatch who will rule this state by executive order and administrative rule like no other governor has ever done before him. Believe me it will not be pretty.
11.7.2006 5:02am

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?